• Headlines
  • World News
  • Commercial Law
  • Famous Cases
  • Interviews
  • Photo News
  • Property Law
  • Lifestyle
Thursday, February 25, 2021
  • Login
Gavel International
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
The Gavel
No Result
View All Result
Home World News

U.S. appeals court upholds Trump administration’s abortion rules

by
February 24, 2020
Reading Time: 2 min
0
U.S. appeals court upholds Trump administration’s abortion rules
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
ADVERTISEMENT


SEATTLE — A U.S. appeals court on Monday upheld Trump administration changes that include additional hurdles for those seeking abortions through a federal program that helps low-income women.

RelatedPosts

Spain to legalize euthanasia and aided suicide

Facebook faces antitrust lawsuits for Privacy invasion of Instagram users and Illegal Monopolization from the FTC

#ENDSARS: President Buhari officially addresses protesting youths, assures extensive Police Reforms

The 7-4 ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned decisions issued by judges in Washington, Oregon and California. The court had already allowed the administration’s changes to begin taking effect while the government appealed those rulings.

The rules ban taxpayer-funded clinics in the Title X program from making abortion referrals and prohibit clinics that receive federal money from sharing office space with abortion providers — a rule critics said would force many to find new locations, undergo expensive remodels or shut down.

More than 20 states and several civil rights and health organizations challenged the rules in cases filed in Oregon, Washington and California. Judges in all three states blocked the rules from taking effect, with Oregon and Washington courts issuing nationwide injunctions. One called the new policy “madness” and said it was motivated by “an arrogant assumption that the government is better suited to direct women’s health care than their providers.”

Planned Parenthood has already left the Title X program over the new rules, giving up about $60 million a year in federal funding.

The 9th Circuit’s majority opinion, by Judge Sandra Ikuta, found that the U.S. Supreme Court had already approved nearly identical regulations in a 1991 decision.

You should also READ  Children in Spain allowed to play outdoors as country eases COVID-19 lockdown

The dissent, by Judge Richard Paez, found that since the high court’s decision, Congress had barred the Department of Health and Human Services from imposing rules “that frustrate patients’ ability to access health care.”

The American Medical Association criticized the ruling.

“This government overreach and interference demands that physicians violate their ethical obligations – prohibiting open, frank conversations with patients about all their health care options – if they want to continue treating patients under the Title X program,” it said in a written statement. “It is unconscionable that the government is telling physicians that they can treat this underserved population only if they promise not to discuss or make referrals for all treatment options.”

Abortion is a legal medical procedure, but federal laws prohibit the use of Title X or other taxpayer funds to pay for abortions except in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the woman. Abortion opponents and religious conservatives say Title X has long been used to indirectly subsidize abortion providers.


Source link

Like this:

Like Loading...
Tags: Donald TrumpDonald Trump abortionHealthPoliticsTrumpTrump abortionTrump abortion lawstrump abortion policiestrump abortion rulestrump low income abortionU.S. abortion lawsU.S. Appeals CourtWorld

Next Post
Russia would see the United States ‘tear ourselves apart,’ warns FBI official

Russia would see the United States ‘tear ourselves apart,’ warns FBI official

Discussion about this post

Trending News

  • Mohamed Bazoum wins Niger Republic’s Presidency February 23, 2021
  • Ex-Air Chief, Umar acquitted of 6 out of 7 corruption charges February 23, 2021
  • Court adjourns Kalu’s case against EFCC till April 20 for hearing February 23, 2021
  • Living in a failed state February 23, 2021
  • EFCC’s failure to serve suspects stall re-arraignment of former Aviation Minister, Oduah February 22, 2021
The Gavel

© 2020 Gavel International - Powered by Realdata.

Navigate Site

  • Headlines
  • World News
  • Commercial Law
  • Famous Cases
  • Interviews
  • Photo News
  • Property Law
  • Lifestyle

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Court rejects duress claim by Ondo PDP chairman in N500m fraud case
  • Newsletter
  • Welcome to The Gavel

© 2020 Gavel International - Powered by Realdata.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add The Gavel to your Homescreen!

Add
%d bloggers like this: