An Ikeja Special Offences Court has rejected the bail application filed by embattled former socialite and alleged fraud kingpin, Fred Ajudua, who is standing trial for allegedly defrauding a Palestinian national of over $1 million under false pretences.

The trial judge, Justice Mojisola Dada, ruling on Wednesday, said she was constrained to grant the application due to pending appeals before the Supreme Court. The judge said she would await the Supreme Court’s decision.

“In view of the applications filed at the Supreme Court, I am constrained to make any decision with respect to this instant application filed by the defence counsel. I will abide by the decisions of the Supreme Court,” she ruled.

Ms Dada adjourned further proceedings to 10 and 31 October and 20 November for continuation of trial.

Ajudua’s lawyer, Olalekan Ojo SAN, had urged the court to release his client from custody on medical grounds. He told the court that Ajudua, who was brought to court by medical personnel from the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), is battling chronic kidney disease. “Only the living can stand trial,” Mr Ojo submitted, insisting that his client’s deteriorating health required urgent attention outside detention.

But lawyer to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Seidu Atteh, opposed the application, arguing that Ajudua was already seeking reliefs before the Supreme Court and ought to have channelled his bail request there.

However, Ojo countered Atteh’s opposition, saying application the before the Supreme Court was unrelated to the current bail request and did not concern his client’s custodial status.

The latest bail hearing came after a decision of the Supreme Court to revoke the bail granted to Mr Ajudua by the Court of Appeal in 2018. The Supreme Court’s decision delivered in May ordered Mr Ajudua’s immediate remand in a correctional facility.

The Apex court  revoked the bail after upholding the EFCC’s challenge of two appellate decisions: one that granted Ajudua bail and another that reassigned the case to a new judge for a fresh trial. The Supreme Court ordered that proceedings continue without further delay.

Before the bail ruling on Wednesday, the court heard testimony from the EFCC’s third prosecution witness, Afanda Emmanuel, an investigator.

Mr Emmanuel told the court that Mr Ajudua’s case was transferred from the Nigeria Police Force’s Special Fraud Unit (SFU) to the EFCC’s Advance Fee Fraud Section in 2005, shortly after the Commission’s establishment.

He said that during investigations, the EFCC wrote to several institutions—including the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL), and the Commission’s own forensic laboratory for relevant documents.

But the defence challenged the EFCC’s move to tender certain documents in court, arguing that the materials were neither originals nor certified true copies. Mr Ojo said the prosecution failed to lay the proper foundation for admissibility, since the EFCC’s counsel was not the originator of the documents.

After hearing arguments, Ms Dada admitted two of the documents as exhibits and rejected the others. The case was adjourned to enable the defence to cross-examine the witness

Mr Ajudua is facing 12 counts of conspiracy to obtain money by false pretence, forgery, and uttering forged documents. He was accused of defrauding Zad Abu Zalaf, a Palestinian national, of $1,043,000 in 1993.

The EFCC alleged that Mr Ajudua and a co-defendant, Joseph Ochunor (still at large), forged documents purportedly issued by the CBN and NNPCL to lend credibility to the scam. According to investigators, the duo received $268,000 on April 2, 1993, and an additional $225,000 on May 12, 1993, from Zalaf.

The commission also presented testimony from German businessman Michael Kreamer, who said he handed Zalaf $550,000 in 1993 based on representations made by Mr Ajudua.

Mr Kreamer testified that Mr Ajudua appeared credible after a meeting in an office filled with luxury cars and men in uniform, but later realised he had been scammed.

Originally filed in 2005 before another Justice Morenike Obadina, the case stalled for years due to Mr Ajudua’s repeated failure to appear in court at least 24 times between 2005 and 2009.  The matter was struck out in 2009, reinstated in 2017, and reassigned to several judges before finally returning to Justice Dada in 2018.

Mr Ajudua had previously secured bail on medical grounds in another matter before another judge Josephine Oyefeso. His lawyer, Norrison Quakers (SAN), had also cited serious health conditions—including having only one functional kidney—to argue for leniency.

However, EFCC prosecutors objected, noting a consistent pattern of delay and abuse of the court process.

Ms Dada agreed, previously ruling that medical-related adjournments had already stalled the case for over 13 years.

Dear readers, we really need your support to keep on serving you with authoritative, truthful, and juicy stories everyday. For your support, please reach out to the editor @gavelinternational66@gmail.com