By Hassanat Adebowale
Russia and the United States have reached an agreement on a temporary ban targeting specific facilities in their respective energy systems. The breakthrough was achieved during talks held in Riyadh on March 25, according to Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov.
Speaking on Wednesday, Peskov explained that a list of Russian and Ukrainian facilities falling under the moratorium was swiftly finalized thanks to diplomatic contacts between Moscow and Washington. “It is thankful to these contacts that were possible to quickly agree on a list of Russian and Ukrainian facilities that fall under the temporary moratorium on attacks on the energy system,” Peskov said.
He emphasized that both sides must respect the moratorium, describing it as a positive development fostered by dialogue between the two nations. “The moratorium on strikes on Russian and Ukrainian energy systems must be respected,” he said. “It was a good step forward and was formed thanks to dialogue between Moscow and Washington.”
Peskov added that Russian President Vladimir Putin’s directive regarding the moratorium is being implemented by the country’s armed forces. “Russian President Vladimir Putin’s order regarding the moratorium is in effect and is being implemented by our armed forces,” he confirmed.
However, Peskov criticized Ukraine, alleging continued attempts to target Russian energy infrastructure despite the agreement. “Ukraine’s attempts to strike Russian energy facilities are well known. Kiev has repeatedly demonstrated its inability to negotiate,” Peskov remarked.
GI’s Legal Corner
This agreement touches on important principles of the law of armed conflict, particularly those outlined in the Geneva Conventions, which stress the protection of civilian infrastructure.
Attacking civilian facilities, including energy systems, is a breach of international humanitarian law (IHL) if it causes disproportionate harm to civilians or lacks clear military necessity.
While the moratorium represents a significant diplomatic step forward, its long-term viability is uncertain due to the absence of a formal treaty or an enforcement mechanism.
If either side breaks the agreement, there would be limited options apart from renewed diplomatic talks or even military responses. However, this development could serve as a foundation for future efforts to de-escalate the conflict.
Dear readers, we really need your support to keep on serving you with authoritative, truthful, and juicy stories everyday. For your support, please reach out to the editor @gavelinternational66@gmail.com