Dr. Abejide Olusegun
The recent exchange between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was not merely a political confrontation, but rather a critical moment for the globalist war agenda. Trump’s words were unambiguous, delivered with the force of someone who has grown tired of Washington’s endless entanglements: “President Zelensky is not ready for peace. He’s gambling with World War III. You either make a deal, or we are out.” The reaction from Zelensky and his European allies confirmed what many have suspected for some time—peace is not on the table. Instead, war is the preferred path for those seeking to prop up a crumbling Western order.
Zelensky’s stance is not one of a leader trying to safeguard his nation. It is the stance of a figurehead acting on behalf of a much larger geopolitical machine. His resistance to peace negotiations is not rooted in the best interests of Ukraine but in the survival of a neocon-driven agenda that thrives on perpetual conflict. The stakes are not just about Ukraine but about the future of Europe itself. Once hailed as an economic and political powerhouse, the European Union is now perilously close to economic collapse. With a shrinking industrial base, skyrocketing energy costs, and unsustainable debt, European leaders are increasingly seeing war as their only viable way to escape disaster. It may sound like an oxymoron, but that’s the reality.
Across the continent, governments that once championed diplomacy are now doubling down on their commitment to war. The recent revival of discussions about an EU army signals a fundamental shift in strategy. Instead of pursuing de-escalation, European leaders are preparing for a deeper confrontation, one that extends beyond Ukraine and directly challenges Russia. The motivations behind this push for militarization are clear. Years of misguided policies, including draconian COVID lockdowns, reckless climate change initiatives, and disastrous sanctions on Russia, have left economies in shambles. Germany, once the economic engine of Europe, has seen its economy contract by as much as five percent. Growth across the EU has stagnated, and confidence in the Euro is plummeting. The European elite understand the reality they face: without a radical shift, the entire system will collapse under the weight of its failures.
In this context, backing Zelensky’s war effort is not about defending democracy or protecting sovereignty. It is about maintaining a financial and political system that is rapidly losing its legitimacy. By keeping the war going, European leaders are buying time, postponing the economic reckoning that awaits them. This explains their unwavering support for Zelensky, even as Ukraine’s military situation deteriorates. The mainstream media have largely ignored the revelations of corruption in Ukraine, but the facts are undeniable. In a newly released report, Zelensky himself admitted that fifty-eight percent of the three hundred and fifty billion dollars in U.S. aid has gone missing. This is a staggering amount of money, disappearing into the abyss of oligarchic greed and war profiteering. Trump’s response was pointed and necessary: “You cut the funding, and you are going to find out the truth. Trump should cut every single penny. Bring it all out.”
Despite these admissions, Zelensky remains confident, even defiant. His arrogance is not a product of military strength but of the belief that Europe will replace the United States as Ukraine’s primary benefactor. But Europe, for all its posturing, is in no position to bankroll a prolonged war. With dwindling economic resources and a restless population growing weary of conflict, the notion that the EU can sustain Ukraine’s war effort is little more than an illusion.
At the same time, another crucial development is unfolding—an exodus of capital from Europe to the United States. Large amounts of gold have been moving across the Atlantic, signaling deep uncertainty among European financial elites. This is not a coincidence. Historically, gold movements precede major geopolitical shifts. The transfer of wealth to the U.S. suggests that those in the know are preparing for a significant escalation in global instability. Reports indicate that this trend has accelerated in recent weeks, with analysts warning that Europe is heading toward a military confrontation that it cannot win. Predictions suggest that by mid-May, the situation will reach a critical breaking point.
The neoconservative faction pushing for this war remains undeterred. Figures such as Dick Cheney, Liz Cheney, and Adam Kinzinger have positioned themselves as the ideological architects of an extended confrontation with Russia. Their rhetoric has been reckless, their assumptions deeply flawed. Kinzinger, for instance, once claimed that Russia could be defeated in three days—a statement so detached from military reality that it underscores the level of delusion guiding Western policy. These individuals, embedded within Washington’s political apparatus, have continuously peddled falsehoods to justify an ever-deepening commitment to war. Their interests are not aligned with those of the American people nor with those of the soldiers and civilians who bear the cost of their decisions.
Trump’s call to withdraw from NATO is not just a political position; it is a strategic necessity. NATO, once a defensive alliance, has become an instrument for neoconservative ambitions, entangling the United States in conflicts that serve no national interest. The organization has long ceased to be a mechanism for collective security and has instead become a tool for provoking unnecessary confrontations. Cutting ties would force European leaders to confront the realities of their own failed policies and expose the underlying corruption that has fueled the war in Ukraine.
Ukraine itself stands on the brink of total collapse. Advanced geopolitical analysis systems, such as Socrates, have identified an alarming trend—Ukraine’s economic and political viability has effectively flatlined. No other country in recent history has exhibited such a pattern. This is not a testament to resilience, but rather a dire warning. The nation is not just struggling; it is dying. The continued infusion of Western aid may prolong the inevitable, but it will not change the outcome.
Meanwhile, the much-publicized predictions of an imminent collapse of the U.S. dollar have proven to be baseless. Instead, the euro is facing a crisis that could lead to its extinction. The economic fundamentals are undeniable. While the dollar remains strong, buoyed by capital inflows from Europe and Asia, the euro is struggling to maintain relevance in an environment of growing instability. This financial reality further reinforces the desperation driving European leaders toward war. They are not acting from a position of strength but from a position of fear.
The implications of these developments are profound. If Trump’s warnings are heeded—if funding is cut, if NATO is dismantled, and if the corruption in Ukraine is fully exposed—the neoconservative war agenda could finally be derailed. However, if these steps are not taken, the world risks descending into an even greater crisis. Facing the collapse of their grand project, the European elite will do anything to maintain their power. Their reliance on war as a political and economic tool makes them dangerous, not just to their citizens, but to global stability as a whole.
The media, complicit in perpetuating false narratives, have failed to ask the necessary questions. They have echoed talking points that serve the interests of a ruling class determined to maintain the illusion of control. However, their narrative is becoming increasingly fragile. The missing billions, the exodus of capital, the faltering Euro, the stagnation of Ukraine—these are not isolated issues. They are symptoms of a system in terminal decline.
The confrontation between Trump and Zelensky was not just a debate between two leaders; it was a microcosm of a much larger struggle. It was a clash between those who seek to preserve a decaying order through perpetual war and those who demand accountability, realism, and a return to national sovereignty. As the global balance of power shifts, the choices made in the coming months will determine the future of Europe, the United States, and beyond. The consequences could not be more significant. The world is watching, and history is being written in real-time.
Stay tuned for my next book, which will explore this topic in depth. Africa should steer clear of this Titan conflict of manipulations. If it must support any side, it should be Russia.
Dear readers, we really need your support to keep on serving you with authoritative, truthful, and juicy stories everyday. For your support, please reach out to the editor @gavelinternational66@gmail.com